Thank You, Secretary Clinton…
I am so pleased to see this statement released from the State Department today. With the State Department speaking out publicly, Liu Xiabo now has a chance to perhaps escape a cruel and unjust fate at the hands of China’s ridiculous “justice” system:
Message on the Indictment of Chinese Activist Liu Xiaobo
The United States was deeply concerned by the formal indictment on charges of “inciting subversion” of the well-known Chinese democracy activist Liu Xiaobo on December 10, International Human Rights Day. According to all publicly available evidence, the basis for his prosecution is that he has signed and supported Charter ’08, which calls for respect for universal human rights and democratic reform.
Mr. Liu has already spent a year in detention while authorities carried out the investigation of his case. We call on the Government of China to release him immediately and to respect the rights of all Chinese citizens to peacefully express their political views and desires for universally recognized fundamental freedoms.
This sends a message of hope not only to Liu Xiaobo and his family but to the thousands of other democracy and human rights activists in China.
I have a hard time believing that China’s timing (handing down the indictment on International Human Rights Day) was just a coincidence- ever since the global financial meltdown China has been more brazen in its violation of its citizens rights. Clearly, China was under the impression that the U.S.’ economic vulnerability meant that it would turn a blind eye to China’s disregard for international law and basic human dignity. Hopefully the statement from the State Dept. above signals to China that the U.S. can walk and chew gum at the same time- we can focus on both human rights and the economy, particularly given the two issues overlap.
Naturally, China has responded to the U.S. (and the rest of the world) call for his release with their usual, tired mantra of “we do not accept you meddling in our internal affairs.” *Yawn* Same old, same old. Of course, China has no problem meddling in everyone else’s internal affairs by issuing thinly-veiled threats to world leaders who express an interest in meeting with the Dalai Lama. And while China may dig in its heels now, shining a light on China’s abuses could force their hand down the road because they HATE the bad PR that results when the international community finally stands up to them (think the Genocide Olympics campaign).
Here is some background information on his case. This article is from December 2008:
A leading dissident who organised a charter signed by hundreds of Chinese thinkers, academics and writers calling for dramatic political and legal reforms was under arrest yesterday.
Liu Xiaobo, a literary critic first jailed for his role in the 1989 Tiananmen Square demonstrations, was taken from his home in Beijing late on Monday by a dozen police officers and was asked to sign a document acknowledging his detention. They searched his flat and took away three computers, mobile phones and documents, friends told The Times.
His arrest came hours before the release on the internet of the “08 Charter”, a rare, outspoken document challenging the ruling Communist Party to grant greater freedom of expression and to hold free elections. Its publication was timed to coincide with the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights today.
A total of 303 people — from a prominent Tibetan blogger to lawyers and a disgraced former senior Communist Party official — braved possible arrest and jail to put their names to the document.
[snip]
Another organiser of the document, the activist Zhang Zuhua, was detained on Monday night, his computers confiscated and his savings removed from his bank accounts. He remained defiant after being released yesterday. He said: “It was a very constructive document. We asked them which clauses were miswritten and they didn’t say.”
However, there was no word from the Ministry of Public Security as to the fate of Mr Liu, 53. An academic who first came to prominence in the mid-1980s as a literary critic, Mr Liu is no stranger to China’s prisons. He has been arrested repeatedly since he spent 20 months in detention after the 1989 protests. He was jailed for three years in the 1990s but remains among the most outspoken and irrepressible critics of the system.
…
And regarding China’s legal system:
China’s courts are under the total control of the party, so it is almost certain that Liu Xiaobo will be convicted.
When President Obama visited China last month, he took a soft approach to human rights.
But he did present China with a list of cases that the US was concerned about, it is thought that Mr Liu’s name was on it.
But China ignored Mr Obama, and less than a month later, the state pushed ahead with its prosecution of Mr Liu.
Before, when US presidents and other world leaders visited, China would often release a dissident.
Police detain a Chinese petitioner outside Beijing’s foreign ministry in Beijing, 10 December 2008
Protests are not uncommon in ChinaAround the time of President Bush’s visit in 2005, Wang Wanxing was released from 13 years detention.
When President Clinton visited, Wang Dan, one of the Tiananmen protesters, was set free.
But now, China no longer needs to worry about what the West thinks.
[snip]
It was thought the Olympics would make things better, prosperity would make things better, and leaving China to move at its own pace would make things better.
But human rights and legal reforms are moving backwards, not forward.
China is a country ruled by law, the government likes to claim. Except, it is not.
Wang Shengjun is the chief justice, but he has never been to law school.
However, he does have excellent contacts within the Communist Party.
And he has been a very loyal cadre, halting years of legal reform by telling China’s judiciary to reject the concept of independent courts.
[snip]
What does it mean to live in a country without law?
It means that the parents of the schoolchildren who died in the Sichuan earthquake will never get their day in court.
It means that people poisoned by China’s filthy factories have never been able to sue.
That farmers robbed of their land by corrupted officials are left destitute.
And it means living in fear, which drives people to desperation.
In Chengdu, Sichuan, 47-year-old Tang Fuzhen tried to stop the local government from demolishing her home.
But the bulldozers and demolition crews arrived early one morning.
She could take no more, so she covered herself in petrol and set herself alight. She later died in hospital.
Eight of her family members, including her husband and son were then detained for “disrupting government work”.
Across China, those who are frustrated by corruption or injustice are taking to the streets.
They did so on the island of Xiamen to stop a chemical plant being built near their homes; in Shanghai it was the threat of a new railway line; in Guangdong, to protest a planned waste incinerator.
And in each case it was the middle class, the newly rich, those who had benefited from the party’s rule, who took to the streets.












I second this. It was nice to see the State Dept. come out address this head on because the administration’s failure to do so was becoming glaring.
Stacy- it was good of you to point out that the State Dept. did this- I know the issue of human rights in China is important to you. Clinton was pretty harshly criticized during her first trip to Asia when she was seen as letting China off the hook by announcing human rights concerns wouldn’t get in the way of other seemingly more important issues. As I’ve said before I was kind of taken aback by that and I still wonder how much of that was Hillary Clinton’s personal view and how much of it was the view of the Obama administration as a whole. I just couldn’t reconcile her comments with her long history of fighting for human rights including her speaking out as FLOTUS in Beijing. I know she’s known for being pragmatic I agree with your assessment that as a result of the administration going soft on China’s human rights abuses, China has made a point of actually being worse in that area and flaunting it all of our faces and that simply shouldn’t be tolerated.
Hi Steve, thanks for your comment/input.
As I’ve said a million times here I think that Hillary is uniquely positioned to promote change with respect to human rights- I think she has much more credibility on this issue than Obama and I was a bit surprised by the administration’s rather dismissive attitude towards human rights in the beginning. I think that the real test of one’s commitment to human rights is not whether one stands up against oppression only when it’s politically easy and risk-free to do so but rather when it’s not and China is the perfect example.
I really believe that China can and will respond to international *public* pressure to get its act together- remember all the outrage over the revelation of sweat shops not only in China but in other parts of the world? That hurt business and countries, including China, were forced to respond. Unfortunately sweat shops and slave labor conditions still exist b/c they have gone underground but progress was clearly made. And then with the Genocide Olympics campaign leading up to the Beijing olympics- China was infuriated but was forced to make concessions and promise to also make improvements but they didn’t follow through and why? Because after the Olympics were over the international community did not follow through and keep the pressure on China. And of course the more public pressure there is the more information that seeps into China through their Great Firewall- China doesn’t want its citizens hearing all the criticism of their oppressive tactics but they can’t control everything all the time and thus keeping any official criticism of China behind closed doors just plays into the Chinese govt’s propaganda machine and attempts to hide what they are really doing.
Steve, you might be interested in this article from foreignpolicy.com- it’s pretty harsh but it raises some of the same concerns you did:
http://shadow.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2009/12/15/clinton_on_human_rights_digging_out_of_a_hole