Buyer’s Remorse Yet?
I’m not going to say “I told you so” to the folks who voted for Obama in the primaries but….I told you so.
For progressive Obama supporters, things aren’t looking all that promising in terms of “change we can believe in”, health care [ie. insurance] reform notwithstanding. It didn’t help when Rahm Emanuel referred to the strategy of liberal advocacy groups as “retarded” because they were advocating for the specific health reform policies which Obama had promised during his campaign. As time wears on a lot of those promises have gone the way of the dodo bird, which is why the tea party claims of an impending socialist takeover are laughable at best.
While many Democratic Presidents often blame the “real world” and “pragmatism” for abandoning the progressive principles on which they campaigned, lets be honest, a lot of it just giving in to the beltway conventional wisdom and mainstream media’s love of tossing around the word liberal as though it’s an epithet. To be fair, Obama is certainly not the only Democrat in America’s history to toss liberals over the side of the boat.
So, who in the administration does everyone like and respect?
Secretary Clinton’s poll numbers have been stratospheric pretty much from day one and here’s one more poll to cement her status as the last great hope for this administration right now:
…And a new CNN/Opinion Research Poll has just revealed that even today Americans like that other Democrat more and dislike that other Democrat less than they do the incumbent Democratic president.
That other Democrat is, of course, Hillary Clinton, who fought and scratched her way mightily but unsuccessfully through those bitter, belligerent Democratic primaries and caucuses of 2008. The former first lady and current secretary of State professes no intra-mural interest in challenging her White House boss, as she must as long as she’s an administration team member.
The published CNN article focused on an Obama matchup with Sarah Palin. But within the data were Favorable/Unfavorable ratings for numerous prominent politicians of both parties. Here are the surprising new poll numbers for Clinton:
61% now think favorably of the former senator and only 35% unfavorably, both numbers improved from the 56% and 40% she had during the Democratic National Convention in late August of 2008.
An early 2012 political buttonIt is, on one level, an impressive turnaround for the once polarizing political figure.
And on another level it’s a comment on the polarity of the political climate presided over by someone who promised to bring people together and change Washington’s harsh partisan tone, another postponed campaign vow like eliminating Guantanamo and “Don’t Ask-Don’t Tell.”
By comparison, in the same CNN poll, 57% of Americans now think favorably of Obama, down from 78% just before his inauguration; and 41% now think unfavorably of him, more than twice his unfavorable rating of early 2009.
Clinton’s numbers also beat all other both Democrats and Republicans in the new poll.
I have a friendly suggestion for Mr. Obama- he may want to be “pragmatic” and acknowledge the reality of the situation and nominate a true progressive for the Supreme Court to replace the Warren Court icon, John Paul Stevens. The GOP will try to filibuster any nominee, no matter how moderate or liberal or whatever, so why not actually nominate someone with the stature and vision to be like Thurgood Marshall, John Paul Stevens or Joseph Brennan? In other words, if there is going to be a fight regardless, why not actually put someone on the Court who isn’t going to continue with the last 10+ years of out of control conservative judicial activism? And note to the MSM- conservatives can be judicial activists too and in fact, right now we have an incredibly activist Court (just check out the recentCitizens Unitedcase). Just because they are better and throwing meaningless soundbites such as “we want someone who faithfully interprets the Constitution and not a liberal who legislates from the bench, blah, blah blah.” In other words, Obama should try to shore up the base instead of constantly selling them out in return for zero Republican support.
I would love Hillary Clinton to run in 2012 or 2016 but I certainly would respect any decision she makes irrespective of what it is- she’s worked hard and served her country non-stop for decades.












I love Hillary. Rise Hillary Rise.
LIEberman is a jackass,especially with his comments to newsmax today. If
LIEberman and the maverick,not a maverick mccain want to go toe to toe with Hillary they will get knocked out. The treaty is Hillary’s baby and she is not going to let these blowhards defeat it. She handled and kicked the butt of the biggest blowhard O’Reily.
Nice post. I just smirk whenever I hear one of his supports whining about something that Obama is doing or not doing. Don’t look at me. I didn’t vote for him (for the record, I wrote in Hillary). Should’ve chosen the one with the record of standing up for what she believes in, whether or not it’s popular or controversial. I agree with you completely about her running again. I’d love to see it, but I will respect whatever decision she makes. Like she said in an interview, you don’t go to your deathbed wishing you had spent more time at the office. Hillary deserves to relax and do the things she wants to do but doesn’t have time for now. Then again, if she takes after her mom, she would have time to serve to terms as president and then write than book…
*supporters
*two
Grr. I hate grammar mistakes.
theprosecutrix, I wrote her name in also for President in the election. I do not think she will run again. I believe that is is her finest hour and we have alot to see before she retires as SOS. That said, HRC most likely has a new journey on her radar screen. She will be very much in the mix of future politics. She needs a break to enjoy her friends, write a book, travel and enjoy. She even said so herself in an interview not long ago with Travis Smiley. No matter what she will do, you can bet she will be working hard for womens rights all around the world.
jillforhill.
was Hillary on the O’reilley show? Where did you get that info?I’M WITH YOU, RISE HILLARY,rise!
She was on during the primaries. Bill likes to puff his chest out,toewr over, and get in the face of his guests. But before he could do that Hillary got face to face with him and kicked his butt so much that he she made him sit back in his chair and made him look small. It was so awesome.
Toewr should be tower
I don’t want to be pessimistic but as much as I admire Secretary Clinton, I think her numbers are high just because she’s not running for President. She has a more low-key job and that’s what people like. The same thing happened during 2007, her numbers were high but as soon as she started campaining it dropped. That’s sad but that’s just how it is, she’s too polarizing.
She was certainly no more polarizing in 2008 or anytime before than than Obama is now. This country is just so divided.
Emilie
You can believe whatever you want. Who did you vote for obama,palin or paul?
I think the same way you admire Hillary is the same way I admire LIEberman.
I’m with you on that jillforhill.
Don’t mistake me, I’m a huge fan of Hillary and I supported her from the very beginning. But not everybody thought the same thing. I’m just looking at this from a broader point of view. A lot of people in the United States have reticences towards her, that’s all I wanted to say. And nobody can deny this.
I agree that being SOS keeps her out of the political arena, and likely helps her numbers. But it also is showing people who have doubts about her that she’s very competent and not the caricature the media has been portraying for years. Remember how the MSM said she wouldn’t be a “team player” under Obama? We all knew that was nothing but rubbish, but others who may have bought that line are realizing how wrong that assumption was.
I’m in agreement with both of you. As I recall she has been painted as only out there for her own selfish interest for a long time and, even though she did well working with her Senate colleagues for eight years, that reputation still stuck. She is hopefully shedding it now given her exemplary performance as Secretary of State, but if she suddenly resigned and formed an exploratory committee for 2012 there would be some who would set about branding her a turncoat – it’s unfortunate, but I’m sure it would happen. The trade-off is the obvious wealth of foreign policy experience she could add to her eight years of domestic policy experience in the Senate. That’s quite a lot of knowledge to bring to any campaign should she ever decide to run for anything again no matter what thew date would be.
I would not, however, say that she is “too” polarizing because I think that definition has changed quite a bit since the 2008 election.
Well said!