Skip to content

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton at the U.N. Human Rights Council *updated*

February 28, 2011

Here’s the video of her remarks:

SECRETARY CLINTON: “Good afternoon. Thank you, Mr. President, and I want to thank the High Commissioner and all my colleagues for their strong words here today, as well as during the special session on Friday.

Today the world’s eyes are fixed on Libya. We have seen Colonel Qadhafi’s security forces open fire on peaceful protestors again and again. They have used heavy weapons on unarmed civilians. Mercenaries and thugs have been turned loose to attack demonstrators. There are reports of soldiers executed for refusing to turn their guns on their fellow citizens, of indiscriminate killings, arbitrary arrests, and torture.

Colonel Qadhafi and those around him must be held accountable for these acts, which violate international legal obligations and common decency. Through their actions, they have lost the legitimacy to govern. And the people of Libya have made themselves clear: It is time for Qadhafi to go – now, without further violence or delay.

The international community is speaking with one voice and our message is unmistakable. These violations of universal rights are unacceptable and will not be tolerated. This Council took an important first step toward accountability on Friday by establishing an independent commission of inquiry.

On Saturday in New York, the United Nations Security Council unanimously adopted a resolution imposing an arms embargo on Libya, freezing the assets of key human rights violators and other members of the Qadhafi family, and referring the Libyan case to the International Criminal Court.

Tomorrow, the UN General Assembly should vote to accept the recommendation to suspend the Qadhafi government’s participation here in the Human Rights Council. Governments that turn their guns on their own people have no place in this chamber.

The Arab League deserves our praise as the first multilateral organization to suspend Libya’s membership — despite the fact that Libya was serving as the Arab League Chair. We hope to see our friends in the African Union follow suit.

We all need to work together on further steps to hold the Qadhafi government accountable, provide humanitarian assistance to those in need, and support the Libyan people as they pursue a transition to democracy. Today, I’ve had the privilege of consulting with a wide range of colleagues here in Geneva and President Obama is meeting with UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon in Washington. We will continue coordinating closely with our allies and partners.

The United States has already imposed travel restrictions and financial sanctions on Qadhafi and senior Libyan officials. We have frozen assets to ensure that they are preserved for the Libyan people. And we have halted our very limited defense trade with Libya. We are working with the United Nations, partners, allies, the International Committee of the Red Cross and the Red Crescent, and other NGOs to set up a robust humanitarian response to this crisis.

As we move forward on these fronts, we will continue to explore all possible options for action. As we have said, nothing is off the table so long as the Libyan Government continues to threaten and kill Libyans.

Ultimately, the people of Libya themselves will be the ones to chart their own destiny and shape their own new government. They are now braving the dictator’s bullets and putting their lives on the line to enjoy the freedoms that are the birthright of every man, woman, and child on earth. Like their neighbors in Tunisia and Egypt, they are asserting their rights and claiming their future.

Now, while the circumstances in Egypt, Tunisia, and Libya are each unique, in every case the demand for change has come from within, with people calling for greater civil liberties, economic opportunities’ and a stake in the governance of their own societies.

And the world has been inspired by their courage and their determination. We see in their struggles a universal yearning for dignity and respect. And they remind us that the power of human dignity is always underestimated until the day it finally prevails.

This moment belongs to the people, particularly the young people, of the Middle East. On behalf of President Obama and the American people, let me say that we are inspired by what you are doing and heartened by what it means for your future. The United States supports orderly, peaceful, and irreversible transitions to real democracies that deliver results for their citizens.

On this our values and interests converge. Because supporting these transitions is not simply a matter of ideals. It is also a strategic imperative. Without meaningful steps toward representative, accountable, and transparent governance and open economies, the gap between people and their leaders will only grow, and instability will deepen. What might have been possible in the 20th century, with new technologies and the power that people now have to connect, is no longer possible.

And to hang on to systems that are unaccountable and that do not respond to the legitimate needs of one’s people poses a danger, not only a danger to leaders but a danger to all of our interests. By contrast, history has shown that democracies tend to be more stable, more peaceful, and ultimately more prosperous.

Democratic change must grow from within. It cannot be implanted from the outside. And let me be among the first of many to say the West certainly does not have all of the answers. The first steps of change have come quickly and dramatically. It is, however, proving tragically difficult in Libya. In other nations, change is likely to be more deliberate and methodical. In all cases, the United States will support citizens and governments as they work for progress.

We are well aware of the challenges that come with these kinds of transitions. You cannot create jobs or economic opportunities overnight. These changes can be chaotic. And in the short term, there will be new voices and political competitions emerging for the first time. And as history has shown, these new births of democracy, of freedom, of human rights, can be derailed by autocrats who use violence, deception, and rigged elections to stay in power or to advance an undemocratic agenda. But like Colonel Qadhafi, leaders who deny their people freedom and opportunity will, in the end, fuel the very instability they fear.

So the process of transition must be protected from anti-democratic influences from wherever they come. Political participation must be open to all people across the spectrum who reject violence, uphold equality, and agree to play by the rules of democracy. Those who refuse should not be allowed to subvert the aspirations of the people. And leaders cannot claim democratic legitimacy if they abandon these principles once they are in power.

Free and fair elections are essential to building and maintaining democracy, but elections alone are not sufficient. Sustainable democracies are built on strong institutions, including an independent judiciary that promotes the rule of law and helps ensure official accountability and transparency, and stands against corruption.

Recent days have underscored the importance of the freedom of expression, whether it’s in the public square, through the press, or on the internet. Brave journalists have broadcast images of repression around the world, and the young people of Tunisia and Egypt have shown everyone what a force for democracy, the open exchange of ideas, can be.

A vibrant civil society is also an indispensable building block of democracy. And not only in the Middle East but around the world, citizen activists and civic organizations are emerging as strong voices for progress. They help develop solutions to tough problems. They hold governments accountable. They empower and protect women and minorities. The United States is committed to broadening our own engagement with civil society, and we urge leader and governments to treat civil society, as partners, not adversaries.

There also must be for transitions to thrive a commitment to make economic opportunity available to all. Human rights, democracy, and development are inextricably linked and mutually reinforcing. We have seen how inequity and lack of economic opportunities drive people into the streets. So to earn the confidence of one’s own people, governments have to deliver on the promise of improved lives.

There is no doubt that the most important goal for most people in the world today is a decent life for themselves and their families. At the very least, that must be the goal that we deliver on. It is also particularly important that women and minorities have access to opportunity and participation. Nations cannot flourish if half their population is consigned to the margins or denied their rights. We have seen how women play a vital role in driving social and economic progress when they are accorded their rights and afforded equal opportunity. And in so doing, they lift up not only themselves but their families and their societies.

These are not Western principles or American ideals. They are truly universal, lessons learned by people all over the world who have made the difficult transition to sustainable democracy. And as we look at what’s happening now in the Middle East, of course those changes will be shaped by local circumstances and led by local leaders. And people themselves will determine whether or not the change has worked. But universal principles will be important touchstones along the way.

That is why, as we watch what is happening in Egypt, we hope that there will be a broad array of opposition voices and representatives to ensure that the reform process is inclusive. We want to see concrete steps taken, including enacting constitutional reforms and releasing political detainees and lifting the state of emergency. The United States stands ready to assist, however appropriate, especially through economic assistance that helps promote reform and create greater opportunity.

In Tunisia, we welcome the interim leadership’s efforts to form an inclusive, broad-based government and its desire to hold elections as soon as possible. And we were heartened to hear this morning from Tunisia’s state secretary for foreign affairs that it will welcome the opening of a UN human rights office, and open its doors to all UN special rapporteurs. We are supporting the Tunisian people on this long and difficult road ahead. And as other important partners such as Jordan and Bahrain take steps – sometimes very difficult steps – to open their political space, we will stand behind them and support their efforts because we are convinced that they will help advance all of our shared interests.

But now, there is an alternative vision for the future of the region that only promises more frustration and discord. Extremists and rejectionists across the Middle East argue that they are the ones who champion the rights of the downtrodden. For decades, they have claimed that the only way to achieve change is through violence and conflict. But all they have accomplished is to undermine peace and progress. The success of peaceful protests has discredited the extremists and exposed their bankrupt arguments.

Iran, for example, has consistently pursued policies of violence abroad and tyranny at home. In Tehran, security forces have beaten, detained, and in several recent cases killed peaceful protesters even as Iran’s president has made a show of denouncing the violence in Libya. Iranian authorities have targeted human rights defenders and political activists, ex-government officials and their families, clerics and their children, student leaders and their professors, as well as journalists and bloggers.

Last week, the United States imposed new sanctions on Iranian officials for serious human rights abuses. Here at the Human Rights Council, we are proud to be working with Sweden and other partners to establish a special rapporteur on Iran. Its mandate would be to investigate and report on abuses in Iran, and to speak out when the government there does not meet its human rights obligations. Iranian human rights advocates have demanded this step to raise international pressure on their government.

This will be a seminal moment for this Council, and a test of our ability to work together to advance the goals that it represents. Indeed, every member of this Council should ask him or herself a simple question: Why do people have the right to live free from fear in Tripoli but not Tehran? The denial of human dignity in Iran is an outrage that deserves the condemnation of all who speak out for freedom and justice.

The Human Rights Council was founded because the international community has a responsibility to protect universal rights and to hold violators accountable, both in fast-breaking emergencies such as Libya and Cote d’Ivoire, and in slow motion tragedies of chronic abuse, such as Burma and North Korea. We saw this Council at its best on Friday, when it took decisive action on Libya. We saw it in December’s Special Session on Cote d’Ivoire, where the situation is increasingly dire and there’s been a large spike in violence. We must continue sending a strong message to Laurent Gbagbo that his actions are unacceptable, and the international community must keep up the pressure.

Last fall, this Council also took the important decision to create a Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Assembly and Association, and we have likewise seen a strengthening in the Council’s approach to freedom of expression. But too often, still, we are not seeing a serious enough response, to use this institution to advance human rights. Sometimes, the Council does not act, and its integrity is undermined because it defers to regional relations, diplomatic niceties, and cynical politics. Membership on this Council should be earned through respect for human rights. That is the standard laid out by the General Assembly. This Council’s predecessor, the Human Rights Commission, lost its credibility in part because Libya was allowed to serve as its president. It should not take bloodshed for us to agree that such regimes have no place here.

And I must add, the structural bias against Israel – including a standing agenda item for Israel, whereas all other countries are treated under a common item – is wrong. And it undermines the important work we are trying to do together. As member states, we can take this Council in a better, stronger direction.

In 2009, the United States joined the Human Rights Council because President Obama and I believed we could make a difference by working with you on the inside rather than standing on the outside merely as a critic. And over the past 18 months, we have worked together. We’ve reached across regional lines in an attempt to overcome what hobbles this country[i] more than anything else, our divisions as member states. The unity of purpose we have forged with respect to Libya offers us an opportunity to continue that progress.

As we look ahead, and as the Council completes a review of its own operations, we hope to help set a new agenda, based on three principles. First, the Council must have the capacity to respond to emergencies in real time. And it must demonstrate clearly that it possesses the will to address gross abuses, hold violators accountable, and work with governments, citizens, and civil society organizations genuinely committed to reform.

Second, the Council must apply a single standard to all countries based on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It cannot continue to single out and devote disproportionate attention to any one country.

And third, the Council needs to abandon tired rhetorical debates and focus instead on making tangible improvements in people’s lives.

For example, in this session we have an opportunity to move beyond a decade-long debate over whether insults to religion should be banned or criminalized. It is time to overcome the false divide that pits religious sensitivities against freedom of expression and pursue a new approach based on concrete steps to fight intolerance wherever it occurs.

Together, we can and must help this Council live up to its mission and ensure that it plays a constructive role in the days and months ahead. We will face new problems and new challenges, but if we have a firm foundation rooted in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, we will chart a study course.

Make no mistake, this popular wave for reform is spreading, not receding. Each country is unique, but many of the concerns that drove people into the streets and squares of the Middle East are shared by citizens in other parts of the world. Too many governments are hobbled by corruption and fearful of change. Too many young people cannot find jobs or opportunities. Their prospects are shaped more by who they know than by what they know or what they can dream. But it is not my mother’s or even my world any more. What has happened with new technologies of the 21st century means that young people know everything that is going on everywhere, and they no longer will tolerate a status quo that blocks their aspirations.

Young people in the Middle East have inspired millions around the world, and we celebrate what some are rightly calling the Arab Spring. This is a hopeful season for all humanity because the cause of human rights and human dignity belongs to us all.

So for leaders on every continent, the choice becomes clearer day by day: Embrace your people’s aspirations, have confidence in their potential, help them seize it, or they will lose confidence in you.

Those of you who were here on Friday, and many of us watching on our television screens saw the Libyan representative renounce Qadhafi’s violent rule. He said, “Young people in my country today are with their blood writing a new chapter in the history of struggle and resistance. We in the Libyan mission have categorically decided to serve as representatives of the Libyan people and their free will.”

This is the call we should heed. This is a time for action. Now is the opportunity for us to support all who are willing to stand up on behalf of the rights we claim to cherish. So let us do that and let us do it with the sounds of the young people from the streets of Tripoli to the markets of Tunis and the squares of Cairo echoing in our ears. Thank you very much.”


I had a feeling she’d take an opportunity to criticize the Council about Israel. The criticism is valid but it seems a bit politically gratuitous. While it’s true the Council can be totally hypocritical and includes member states with horrendous human rights records, it’s time for the U.S. to stop promoting it’s own double standard by ALWAYS claiming that any international condemnation of Israeli activities is inappropriate and unworthy of attention in any international forum, including the Human Rights Council.

I agree totally with Secretary Clinton that if the Human Rights Council obsessively focuses only on Israel’s alleged crimes or abuses while ignoring those carried out by member states (or any other country), it undermines the credibility Council. No one country should be singled out at the exclusion of others. I am in full agreement with her there. But at the same time, that shouldn’t mean that Israel has a total blank check to escape all international accountability for human rights abuses. However, it would seem that that is exactly what it means, if not in word then at least in deed-for an example see the recent Security Council veto regarding settlements or the U.S.’ successful bid to prevent any meaningful action on the Goldstone Report. And it certainly doesn’t (or shouldn’t) mean that the Palestinians should never be able to have a forum where they can try to have their issues addressed. Unfortunately, I have a feeling that this administration would be hard-pressed to name a single situation or scenario where they would think the Palestinians should have the right to have alleged human rights violations against them considered by an international forum. And that is simply not fair.

16 Comments leave one →
  1. Steve permalink
    February 28, 2011 3:47 pm

    Thanks for posting. Her remarks were good- certainly more strongly worded than of late. I agree that it was largely unnecessary for Clinton to chastise the council about Israel since Israel had nothing to do with anything today. She was right to point out how stupid it was to have Libya heading up the Council until just the other day. But we are pretty selective in who we denounce and who we don’t. Alsowe seem to only “like” going to the UN for action when it suits our particular political needs. Doesn’t that sort of make us hypocritical too? We better get used to hearing about Iran every five minutes because we’re gearing up for 2012. But is the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia less repressive and antisemitic than Iran? I doubt it. Why don’t we denounce them?

  2. Carolyn-Rodham permalink
    February 28, 2011 5:20 pm'counseling'_for_women_seeking_abortions/#paragraph5

    The eternal battle that men have against women who refuse to be kept  “pregnant in the summer and barefoot in the winter” is staggering and alarming.

    • Carolyn-Rodham permalink
      February 28, 2011 5:30 pm

      Sorry – realize this is OT but I’m increasingly concerned about human rights within our own borders

    • March 1, 2011 6:27 am

      That shouldn’t be constitutional but I have a feeling it will be. It’s forced speech if doctor’s don’t feel that such counseling is necessary/ethical etc.

      I don’t know what it will take for Americans to wake up and realize what is going on. I guess so long as Roe is formally on the books women think all is well. They might feel differently when their right to access regular birth control is called into question under Roe, since this certainly isn’t just about abortion, but family planning in general.

      Kathryn Lopez wrote the most sexist nonsense over the weekend in the National Review about how family planning (specifically the pill) is taking women’s power away and she opines on the evil of promiscuity- just for women of course. It’s ok for men. I’ll try to find the link because it’s a good glimpse at how the GOP wants to take us back to oh, 1950.

      I’m beginning to think we’re all being intentionally distracted. While we’re worrying endlessly over a Fear of a Muslim Planet (kind of like the fear of communism in the 1950’s), we’re having our rights abrogated in the name of security, there’s a war on the middle class and women are the target of a growing body of hostile laws under the guise of fiscal responsibility. Where’s the outcry?

  3. March 1, 2011 9:45 am

    OT: Why is Prince Arthur G. Sulzberger, heir to the NYT Throne, bashing unions with patently false front page reporting? And why is Sulzberger himself doing the actual reporting on this? Does Prince Sulzberger usual go out on the beat and interview people? Did I miss something? I thought his place was in the corner office, guarding the Family Jewels?

    I’m not a big Olbermann fan but our MSM is out of control. They are a bunch of pro-corporate, source-greasing, status quo-maintaining hacks.

    There is no liberal media. Sorry guys, but there just isn’t. I know it’s the right’s favorite boogey man but that’s all it is- a myth. There was a time way back when when beat reporters, who got very little money and who identified with the common folk, could rightly be described as “liberal” but today, the media is only as liberal as the huge multinational corporations that own them.

    BTW, if you sense I can’t stand the NYT, you’re right. I can’t.

  4. Thain permalink
    March 1, 2011 10:11 am

    Wow- so the NYT interviewed a “union guy” to bash the unions and praise walker and then Gov. Walker used the NYT to show support for what he’s doing, only to find that the union guy the article was based on wasn’t actually in a union? This is really a huge story. I agree it’s really weird that Sulzberger was on the byline for this story. It should make people wonder what the nyt is up to- that family owns the NYT and one of the heirs writes a story bashing unions?

  5. Thain permalink
    March 1, 2011 10:13 am

    BTW, I don’t like Olbermann either- he’s arrogant. But at this point I’m willing to overlook that because it’s becoming more and more clear that the MSM does not hold government accountable and is ridiculously biased towards corporate interests and the military industrial complex. And don’t even get me started on their bias in favor of the Israel lobby 😉

    • March 1, 2011 10:21 am

      There are some key people trying to hold the MSM accountable- Jay Rosen at Columbia and Glenn Greenwald (recently the subject of a smear attempt by Bank of America and the business lobby) come to mind. Greenwald’s willingness to take on the powers that be have made him a lot of powerful enemies.

      Here’s his most recent column about how MSM “journalists” are far too willing to buy into nationalistic propaganda so long as the govt claims there are national security interests involved.

      It’s during times of crisis, war etc. that we NEED a skeptical media. The media gets so protectionist regarding the military- it’s really disturbing. The reaction of the MSM to Michael Hasting’s reporting on Gen. McCrystal is the perfect example. Also, who can forget how the NYT and WaPo reprinted govt lies about Iraq and was actively cheerleading for the war?

      Then look at WikiLeaks- the NYT etc. only published certain information contained in the cables at the request of the govt. I was criticized on this blog for complaining about how the media selectively chose to focus on certain things (Iran) at the expense of other information contained in the cables. And of course the MSM was offered cables relating to Israel and NOT A SINGLE U.S. media outlet would publish them. Reasonable people can disagree as to whether WikiLeaks serves any journalistic function, but I don’t think there can be much disagreement about the bias and subjectivity evidenced by the media in subjectively choosing which issues to focus on.

  6. Thain permalink
    March 1, 2011 11:09 am

    Speaking of the media and bias, how come when Palestinian kids throw rocks in response to rubber bullets they are partaking in “violence” (not self defense) but when Jewish Israeli settlers fire bomb a Palestinian house it’s referred to as “vandalism?”

    I think one time here we discussed how the media’s word choices when discussing Israel help shape public opinion. They rarely use the words “occupation,” “illegal,” “self defense” (at least with Palestinians) and on and on. These things are subtle but they matter.

    It’s also interesting that rock throwing is only violent extremism when Palestinians do it. When the people in the streets of Egypt, Tunisia etc. do it it’s justifiable self defense- I agree that it is just that but why only for some people?

    I wonder if Ethan Bronner or Isabel Kershner will report on this price tag violence by settlers?

    On another note the Israeli embassy in Washington has banned any Israeli officials from taking part in the J-Street conference taking place this week (and last weekend) because they are enemies of Israel. Got that? The Jewish pro-Israel group J-Street are anti-Israel because they oppose settlement construction. Now would be a good time for American Jews to speak up about this nonsense. I also guess this is why someone like Hillary won’t be speaking at J Street any time soon (but will show up for the annual AIPAC powwow)

  7. March 20, 2013 8:52 pm

    I love watching her in videos. She’s so confident.


  1. I Love Representative Mike Rogers! | I'm Wide Awake
  2. I Love Representative Mike Rogers! |
  3. I Love Representative Mike Rogers! | BROADCAST WORLDWIDE: WEDNESDAYS @ 12:05AM (ET)
  4. I love Representative Mike Roger’s Idea!
  5. Representative Mike Rogers Proposes Bill to Withdraw from the UN! | The Black Sphere | | The Black Sphere |
  6. Representative Mike Rogers Proposes Bill to Withdraw from the UN! - Rage and War

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: