Skip to content

C-SPAN Live-Streaming Non-Proliferation Conference at U.N.

May 3, 2010

You can watch here. Ahmadinejad is taking the stage right now (12:00p.m.). Secretary Clinton will be addressing the conference at 3:15p.m.

UPDATE: I’m listening to Ahmadinejad and whoever writes his speeches should be fired. He rambles on and is somewhat incoherent. He’s winding all over the place and essentially saying that the U.S. operates with a “might makes right” policy and he’s going on about the immorality of the nuclear arms race. That in and of itself is not the worst thing ever, but he is just rambling and rambling and rambling. It also doesn’t help that the interpreter seems to be having a hard time translating. Uh oh, a U.S. official just walked out of the speech. At this point, the speech is really just painful to listen to. I don’t mean to sound like a snob, but Ahmadinejad sounds like a 6th grader.

UPDATE II: Ok, just finished listening to Ahmadinejad’s speech live-streamed from the U.N. and it was actually painful to listen to- he weaves around, there’s no structure, no organization and he just rambles on and on. Not quite as bad as Khaddafi but give him a few more years and he may be. Listening to him talk about love, compassion, justice and equality at the end was a bitter pill to swallow, given how his government cracks down on any dissent. He seems a little “touched” if you know what I mean.

UPDATE III: Secretary Clinton’s speech is winding down. Now that’s a speech.

Fact sheet from the State Dept:

In her address to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) Review Conference in New York today, Secretary of State Clinton announced new Presidential policy initiatives that further the Administration’s commitment to the Treaty’s core bargain: states without nuclear weapons promise not to acquire them, states with nuclear weapons work towards eliminating them, and all enjoy access to the peaceful uses of the atom. This fact sheet describes the Secretary’s announcements regarding U.S. participation in nuclear-weapon-free zones and expanded support for peaceful uses of nuclear energy. A separate fact sheet will be issued describing a new U.S. initiative on U.S. nuclear stockpile transparency.

Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zones (NWFZ)

The Secretary announced that the United States will seek U.S. Senate advice and consent to ratification of several Protocols to the Africa Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone Treaty (Treaty of Pelindaba) and the South Pacific Nuclear-Weapon-Free Zone Treaty (Treaty of Rarotonga). These treaties complement the NPT and enhance the international nonproliferation regime by prohibiting the development or testing of nuclear weapons within their respective geographic zones. Zone parties are also prohibited from stationing nuclear weapons within their territories. The United States is not eligible to be a Party to either of these treaties, but it is eligible to join treaty Protocols open for signature by the nuclear weapons states. These protocols include a pledge not to test nuclear weapons within the zones and legally-binding assurances not to use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against treaty Parties. The United States understands that such negative security assurances are important to states which have foresworn nuclear weapons and abide by their nuclear non-proliferation obligations.

Following a review of U.S. policy towards the nuclear-weapon-free zones currently in force, the Administration is satisfied that the African and South Pacific treaties are consistent with U.S. and international criteria for such zones. The United States believes that such zones, when fully and rigorously implemented, contribute to the President’s nonproliferation and disarmament goals and to international peace and security. The United States has concluded that the Treaties of Pelindaba and Rarotonga and their Protocols will not disturb existing security arrangements or U.S. military operations, installations, or activities. The Treaties and Protocols will also promote regional cooperation, security and stability and provide a vehicle for the extension of legally-binding negative security assurances, consistent with the strengthened negative security assurance announced in the recent U.S. Nuclear Posture Review.

The United States signed the Protocols to the Treaties of Pelindaba and Rarotonga in 1996. The United States has also signed and ratified the Protocols to the Treaty of Tlatelolco, which established a nuclear-weapon-free zone in Latin America and the Caribbean. With respect to the nuclear-weapon-free zone treaties in force in Southeast Asia and Central Asia, the United States looks forward to continuing consultations with zone parties to explore possible U.S. support for signature and ratification of the applicable protocols.

IAEA Peaceful Uses Initiative

The Secretary announced today a campaign to raise $100 million over the next five years to broaden access to peaceful uses of nuclear energy. The funds are to significantly expand support for projects sponsored by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), addressing energy and important humanitarian purposes, such as cancer treatment and fighting infectious diseases, food and water security, and the development of infrastructure for the safe, secure use of civil nuclear power. These efforts will be aimed to assist developing countries. The United States has pledged $50 million to this effort and will work with others to meet the $100 million target by the opening of the next NPT Review Conference.

Historically, the United States has been the single largest contributor to the IAEA’s technical cooperation programs. These programs enable more than 100 states to enjoy the benefits of peaceful uses of nuclear energy. In addition to its assessed annual contribution to the IAEA, the United States provides more than $20 million each year in extra budgetary funding for IAEA technical cooperation programs alone, about 25 percent of the total contributions. The new U.S. pledge is in addition to this long-standing support, and it represents a significant addition to our current annual commitment to the IAEA’s technical cooperation fund. The United States is taking this step in recognition of the growing international interest in power and non-power uses of nuclear energy and the NPT’s promise of peaceful nuclear sharing with nations that abide by their nuclear non-proliferation commitments. As President Obama said in Prague in April 2009, access to peaceful nuclear energy “must be the right of every nation that renounces nuclear weapons, especially developing countries embarking on peaceful programs.”

17 Comments leave one →
  1. alinosof permalink
    May 3, 2010 12:29 pm

    He sure has a long list of grievances against the U.S. If his speech had been more focus, it might have been effective. It’s just long winded and scattered.

    • May 3, 2010 12:36 pm

      It’s painful to listen to. He’s so tediously predictable. From a purely, cynical political viewpoint, if he really wanted to create a splash he could present a brief speech which outlines his country’s desire for a peaceful nuclear program (ie. for energy) and refrain from singling out Israel and also refrain from doing what he does every single time which is pull out his laundry list of past wrongs committed by the U.S. (according to him). Now THAT would be a shocker.

      Listening to him talk about peace, love, justice, affection, compassion etc. is a bit hard to take given how he cracked down on Iranian protesters.

      • rachel permalink
        May 3, 2010 3:18 pm

        Okay I just logged on to the link you gave to watch live because Hillary is suppose to be on please tell me this a recap and this man isnt STILL speaking.

  2. May 3, 2010 3:25 pm

    rachel- no, that’s from earlier- I don’t know why they are repeating it. I went back to cspan’s homepage and it says 3:15 Secretary Clinton but then its not a clickable link- I’m trying to find another site that’s live-streaming it.

  3. May 3, 2010 3:26 pm

    Oh, cspan says she’ll address the UN shortly so maybe they are replaying his speech? Why, because it was so good? Sheesh, once was enough.

  4. alinosof permalink
    May 3, 2010 3:39 pm

    SOS Clinton is now live on c span.

  5. May 3, 2010 3:40 pm

    Yup, got it now, I had to refresh the page, duh!

  6. Steve permalink
    May 3, 2010 3:44 pm

    Heheheh, she just called out Iran

    • May 3, 2010 3:55 pm

      Yup. And she did it in a way that called him out on his BS didn’t feed into his need for constant attention.

      I will say that we need to put more pressure on not just states like Iran who don’t follow though with their nonproliferation agreements but states that have refused to sign on, like India, Pakistan, N. Korea and Israel. To me, that seems like a glaring lapse. Well, we are punishing N. Korea but not the others.

  7. alinosof permalink
    May 3, 2010 3:57 pm

    Yes, she’s awesome. Short and precise. Now, let’s see how the rest of the nations react, Israel included.

  8. May 3, 2010 4:01 pm

    Did I hear her correctly? Didn’t she say she supports a nuclear-free zone in the Middle East? The fact sheet I just posted talks about nuclear free zones but not in the Mideast. I hope she said that because I think it’s a fantastic idea- this idea of picking and choosing who can become nuclear weapons states just isn’t working.

    • Steve permalink
      May 3, 2010 4:06 pm

      Yeah, I thought she did. Will you post the video later if its available?

      I missed Iran’s speech- from what you guys were saying it sounds bad. Should I try to find it on video and listen to it or just skip it?

      • May 3, 2010 4:08 pm

        Oh, definitely skip it- it’s 45 minutes of your life you’ll never get back.

  9. HillaryFan permalink
    May 3, 2010 5:16 pm

    I watched it and I don’t think she said she supported a nuclear free middle east but I could be wrong. Now the video is not available on cspan, at least not yet.

    Stacy- what you said earlier today in another post about the media feeding into all the drama with Iran today and taking the bait, you are right, they are giving him much more attention than that sorry speech deserved!

  10. HillaryFan permalink
    May 3, 2010 6:35 pm

    Oh, you put up the video, thanks!

    Man, you are all over this 🙂

  11. Moshe Aaron permalink
    May 3, 2010 6:43 pm

    A totally nuclear weapons free middle east is essential. It makes no sense for Israel to be the only nation on earth allowed to have a fully active, proliferating nuclear program while also giving us a free pass on the international obligations expected of every other nuclear state. By enabling this fiction your country provides ammunition to the Oher regional actors, including Iran, to argue they are bei g held to a different standard.

    Stacy, I respect your viewpoint and your eloquence but when you said earlier that Iran had to essentially grow up and demonstrate it can abide by international norms on the nuclear issue I would argue that Israel should do the same.

    • May 3, 2010 7:00 pm

      Moshe, I agree that a nuclear free Mideast will be essential but the US will not just single out Israel so long as the situation with Iran remains volatile. I am actually surprised other countries like Saudi Arabia, UAE haven’t developed nuclear weapons. Or have they?

Leave a comment